Monday, June 19, 2006

GANGING UP ON THE SUN

The new Guster album came in the mail today. It was in a handwritten package. That sort of stuck in my head since this morning.

It's not that I don't like it -- it's very good music -- it just doesn't seem like a Guster album. It sounds a lot like Coldplay or maybe the Shins. I like both of those bands, but I was looking forward to a Guster album and, I dunno, it didn't come. They dropped the acoustic guitars and the bongos for Keep it Together so it was no suprise when they remained absent for this album, but there were even more transformations this time around. The lead singer seems to rely a lot more on falsetto stuff in this album (a major reason for the connection between Ganging Up on the Sun and Coldplay -- I honestly think the vocals in the new album sound a lot like Chris Martin's vocals in X & Y) and there is a ton of synthesized stuff, weird background noises, and extremely layered, complicated music. It all sounds good. It's just so far removed from the folky pop songs I remember hearing in Parachute and Lost and Gone Forever. They're better musicians, yes, but I think they "evolved" out of their niche, out of the place they held in my music library. It's a very polished album, though. I do like it a lot.

Around this time last year I was gearing up to leave for New York City for the summer. I think I left before graduation last year. This is going to be a very different summer. Last summer was -- what's the word? -- doubled sided. I left for six weeks, had an amazing time, learned a ton of useful information, made new friends, blah blah blah, but I came back and I had no connections to anyone in Irondequoit anymore. It was the most surreal shift I've ever encountered. I went from the buzz of a living, breathing city, the constant flow of visitors coming and going, and an endless series of acitivities to silence. I remember the first day back. I woke up and stepped into the hallway outside my room and was shocked into stillness. There wasn't anyone around. There was no elevator sliding open. There was no argument sounding from someone's room. There was nobody sitting in the hallway thumbing through a book. It suddenly occured to me that I hadn't been by myself in six weeks and solitude was a completely alien thing to me. I stepped back into my room, shut the door, and went back to sleep. It really wasn't until school started up again that I settled back in.

So far this summer has been somewhere in between. Nothing can match the intensity of what I experienced last summer, but there is a pretty much constant flow of phone calls, things to accomplish, activities to engage in, etc. I hope it doesn't get overwhelming. I need to remember that between work and what else I still need to find time to read, to study movies, to, most importantly, continue to write. I don't know how much time I'm going to have for that in the next couple of years.

Meh, could be worse. Could be bored.

Somebody told me last year -- I think it was my mentor from school -- that they like to keep a certain amount of suffering and solitude in their life so they can remain a skillful and inspired writer. It seems so strange, to keep everyone at an arm's distance, just so you're not content or, rather, complacent. I think about that from time to time, but something about it always strikes me funny. Sometimes I think that philosophy kind of defeats itself.

2 Comments:

At 3:51 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can definitely see what you mean by saying they evolved out of their niche. It's not at folksy at all, it's more other-worldy, that lovely 21st century field that Coldplay indeed has captured-especially some of the later tracks. It's a lot more mellow than I expected, but very epic and reflective. There's a bit of that ole Guster panache (especially on the songs that have already been released) but a lot of the album sounds like they were just jamming, found a riff or phrase they liked, and made a song out of it. There's a lot of repetition. Good melodies though, their lyrical phrasing has always been catchy. They've evolved and changed, though. Not that change is a bad thing at all-where would any of us be without it?

I love you, Guster.

-Melissa

 
At 9:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Somebody told me last year -- I think it was my mentor from school -- that they like to keep a certain amount of suffering and solitude in their life so they can remain a skillful and inspired writer. It seems so strange, to keep everyone at an arm's distance, just so you're not content or, rather, complacent. I think about that from time to time, but something about it always strikes me funny. Sometimes I think that philosophy kind of defeats itself."

I've been rereading Crime and Punishment as you may know, and one of the things that's struck me on the rereading is how much suffering each of Dostoyevsky's characters endures. I understand that he also felt that it is good for everyone to have some suffering in their lives. He meant for this to be in a religious/spiritual sense, though there may also be good in an artistic/aesthetic sense of suffering. But if I were to raise an objection to the mentors philosophy it would be that suffering is meant to be for the soul's improvement and not for the benefit of one's creativity. I think one's art shouldn't come from one's own suffering so much as it taps into another's or even a universal suffering, if it's going to be concerned with suffering (and not, say beauty).

I worry about what I'll call "the economics" of suffering. Since our economic practice and study are so utilitarian, they ultimately are driven towards eliminating suffering, and even the most minute forms of inconvenience which are so often mistaken for suffering. Buddhists likewise want to eliminate suffering, but they would do so by eliminating desire. An economist's solution would probably only feed desire, ie. demand...that is in the long run.

While I think there ought to be suffering in each life, obviously there'd have to be such a thing as too much. In other words, I hope you didn't suffer through this.

The U.S. just tied it up 1-1.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home